It seems that the push for Afrocentric scholarship, curriculum, etc. has subsided. In the 90's and through the early 2000's there seemed to be far ranging interest across disciplines in Afrocentrism. Led primarily by Molefi Kete Asante (I know everyone probably has their favorite Afrocentrism author, but I'm most familair with Asante.), the movement emphasizes the importance of African people (collectively) and is often seen as a reaction to White and/or Western privledged notions of scientificity and scholarship. But, I have seen little work on Afrocentrism and the law. Brown describes her conception of Afrocentrism as a teaching tool:Given the controversy surrounding Afrocentric education, it is important to clarify my precise position. I view Afrocentric education as an instrumental means to displace "gangsta" norms, rather than as an effort to utilize state funds to perpetuate a particular cultural heritage for its own sake. Thus I advocate for the Afrocentric academy, not as an end in itself, but as a means to an end - namely, the reformulation of cultural norms among urban black youth. In this light, Afrocentric education offers the black community a way to "turn inward" to address pervasive social and cultural problems....
Eleanor Brown, Black Like Me? "Gangsta" Culture, Clarence Thomas, and Afrocentric Academies, 75 N.Y.U. L. R. 308, at 322-3 (2000).
Of course, humyn life began in Africa, and philosophy, religion, and art all had their start on the African continent. This scholarship has had little impact on the law however. A quick Lexis or Westlaw search only yields a few results for "Afrocentrism" or "Afrocentric." Why? Why do we see this scholarship in other disciplines, but barely eking its way into legal scholarship?



