Given the controversy surrounding Afrocentric education, it is important to clarify my precise position. I view Afrocentric education as an instrumental means to displace "gangsta" norms, rather than as an effort to utilize state funds to perpetuate a particular cultural heritage for its own sake. Thus I advocate for the Afrocentric academy, not as an end in itself, but as a means to an end - namely, the reformulation of cultural norms among urban black youth. In this light, Afrocentric education offers the black community a way to "turn inward" to address pervasive social and cultural problems....
Eleanor Brown, Black Like Me? "Gangsta" Culture, Clarence Thomas, and Afrocentric Academies, 75 N.Y.U. L. R. 308, at 322-3 (2000).
Of course, humyn life began in Africa, and philosophy, religion, and art all had their start on the African continent. This scholarship has had little impact on the law however. A quick Lexis or Westlaw search only yields a few results for "Afrocentrism" or "Afrocentric." Why? Why do we see this scholarship in other disciplines, but barely eking its way into legal scholarship?
Monday, November 15, 2010
Whatever happened to Afrocentric Scholarship?
It seems that the push for Afrocentric scholarship, curriculum, etc. has subsided. In the 90's and through the early 2000's there seemed to be far ranging interest across disciplines in Afrocentrism. Led primarily by Molefi Kete Asante (I know everyone probably has their favorite Afrocentrism author, but I'm most familair with Asante.), the movement emphasizes the importance of African people (collectively) and is often seen as a reaction to White and/or Western privledged notions of scientificity and scholarship. But, I have seen little work on Afrocentrism and the law. Brown describes her conception of Afrocentrism as a teaching tool:
Critical race theory, with it's reliance on historical and genealogical inquiry, would be a suitable cognate for Afrocentric legal theory. Clearly we see more international law students in the United States, some form Africa and others from across the continents. International law classes are also becoming more prevalent and there is quite a bit of theoretical work being completed in classes like Legal History, Jurisprudence, and the like. It seems however that the legal academy has failed to fully understand or adapt Afrocentrism to legal scholarship. The reasons for this evade me. Why is there little work being done on African philosophy and the the law and why is Afrocentrism not more commonly referenced in legal theory classes?
Hip-hop may be a place where Afrocentrism can take hold. With Nas and Damian Marley's Distant Relatives and an increasing number of artists from Africa, it seems like there may be an opportunity to engage in substantive hip-hop Afrocentric legal theory. Rappers like Akon, MC Solaar, and K'naan are popular hip-hop voices from Africa. Critical race theory must seek to include all Africans, not simply those in the United States. Hip-hop scholarship must do the same. I know, I know, that notion might offend some people, but an honest look at much of critical race theory work in the legal academy indicates that there is a bias toward focusing this critical lens on U.S. citizens and U.S. legal issues. Stopping critical race theory at the Middle Passage ignores a much more complex history of Africa and African people. Not much legal scholarship seems to be going beyond the beginnings of trans-Atlantic slavery however.
What space should exist for Afrocentrism and hip-hop research in the legal academy? Where or on what legal issue has there been considerable Afrocentrism work? Might there be drawbacks to Afrocentrism? Are there Afrocentric hip-hop artists (for the wiki entry about African hip-hop click here)? These are some of the questions that should be answered.
Let the discussion begin...
Labels:
Africa,
Afrocentrism,
Akon,
hip hop,
K'naan,
MC Solaar,
Molefi Kete Asante,
Nas,
Nick J. Sciullo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)