data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14b50/14b50e7d4075a9f27cfe07b06918f340b0459884" alt=""
According to Billboard.com, In rejecting the trademark and publicity rights infringement claims, Judge Snyder reasoned:
"In analyzing the case, California District Court Judge Christina Snyder applied the so-called 'Monty Python' rule, after a 1976 case where a defendant extensively edited the TV comedy series in order to broadcast it on television. The question was whether the changes to Dr. Dre's album were more than 'cosmetic.'
Snyder ruled the alterations were 'minor and inconsequential.' She also pointed out that the image used on the cover jacket is the same photograph from the original album, instead of a more current photo, which may have gone further to imply some new endorsement."
While Dr. Dre's back royalties claim will go forward, he has lost his trademark infringement claim based primarily on the way he left Death Row in 1996, leaving most of his rights in the catelogue to Suge Knight and Death Row.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteThis post is really very nice. i love to read this blog very much. Thanks for giving me this great information.
I really appreciate this cool article. From there i get something I want to know best replica Rolex GMT . Thanks for the info replica cartier .
ReplyDelete